Pathways, Contextual and Cross-Scale Dynamics of Science-Policy-Society Interactions in Transdisciplinary Research in African Cities

dc.contributor.authorOdume, Oghenekaro N.
dc.contributor.authorAmaka-Otchere, Akosua B.K.
dc.contributor.authorOnyima, Blessing N.
dc.contributor.authorAziz, Fati
dc.contributor.authorKushitor, Sandra Boatemaa
dc.contributor.authorThiam, Sokhna
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T16:22:52Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T16:22:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-10
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are inherently complex. This paper contributes to the literature on co-production of knowledge at the interface of science, policy, and society in integrated, transdisciplinary research (TDR) projects. By analysing five projects of the Leading Integrated Research for Agenda 2030 in Africa (LIRA) implemented in nine African cities, the paper identifies the pathways for sciencepolicy- society interactions (SPSI) within the TDR projects, the cross-scale and contextual dynamics influencing the interactions as well as the challenges of foregrounding the interactions. We identified four SPSI pathways: i) TDR processes, ii) explicitly conceptualising and communicating research projects in relation to mandates and policies, iii) the global sustainability agenda, and iv) relationships and networks. We argued that these pathways can be construed as important windows for foregrounding SPSI in TDR projects. Cross-scale dynamics such as the spatial scale of interactions, actors’ roles, and purposes of engagement were critical determinants of the intensity and frequency of the interactions between the project actors. The analysis suggests that being context-sensitive is key to foregrounding SPSI in TDR projects. Conceptual threshold crossing, resource intensity, power differentials, discontinuity, as well as a history of academic and practice silos present formidable challenges to SPSI in TDR projects. These challenges can be addressed through the identified pathways, adequate capability development; incentivising academics and practitioners engaged in co-production of knowledge; stimulating co-production through adequate resources; building redundancies within the project teams, ideas, and processes, and paying attention to the politics of co-production of knowledge.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://41.204.63.118:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/66
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectCo-production of knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectComplexityen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectSustainable development goals (SDGs)en_US
dc.subjectTriple Helix modelen_US
dc.titlePathways, Contextual and Cross-Scale Dynamics of Science-Policy-Society Interactions in Transdisciplinary Research in African Citiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Odume et al_Pathways.pdf
Size:
827.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: