Digital Repository

Pathways, Contextual and Cross-Scale Dynamics of Science-Policy-Society Interactions in Transdisciplinary Research in African Cities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Odume, Oghenekaro N.
dc.contributor.author Amaka-Otchere, Akosua B.K.
dc.contributor.author Onyima, Blessing N.
dc.contributor.author Aziz, Fati
dc.contributor.author Kushitor, Sandra Boatemaa
dc.contributor.author Thiam, Sokhna
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-16T16:22:52Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-16T16:22:52Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09-10
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.014
dc.identifier.uri http://41.204.63.118:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/66
dc.description Research Article en_US
dc.description.abstract The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are inherently complex. This paper contributes to the literature on co-production of knowledge at the interface of science, policy, and society in integrated, transdisciplinary research (TDR) projects. By analysing five projects of the Leading Integrated Research for Agenda 2030 in Africa (LIRA) implemented in nine African cities, the paper identifies the pathways for sciencepolicy- society interactions (SPSI) within the TDR projects, the cross-scale and contextual dynamics influencing the interactions as well as the challenges of foregrounding the interactions. We identified four SPSI pathways: i) TDR processes, ii) explicitly conceptualising and communicating research projects in relation to mandates and policies, iii) the global sustainability agenda, and iv) relationships and networks. We argued that these pathways can be construed as important windows for foregrounding SPSI in TDR projects. Cross-scale dynamics such as the spatial scale of interactions, actors’ roles, and purposes of engagement were critical determinants of the intensity and frequency of the interactions between the project actors. The analysis suggests that being context-sensitive is key to foregrounding SPSI in TDR projects. Conceptual threshold crossing, resource intensity, power differentials, discontinuity, as well as a history of academic and practice silos present formidable challenges to SPSI in TDR projects. These challenges can be addressed through the identified pathways, adequate capability development; incentivising academics and practitioners engaged in co-production of knowledge; stimulating co-production through adequate resources; building redundancies within the project teams, ideas, and processes, and paying attention to the politics of co-production of knowledge. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.subject Co-production of knowledge en_US
dc.subject Complexity en_US
dc.subject Sustainability en_US
dc.subject Sustainable development goals (SDGs) en_US
dc.subject Triple Helix model en_US
dc.title Pathways, Contextual and Cross-Scale Dynamics of Science-Policy-Society Interactions in Transdisciplinary Research in African Cities en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Ensign Digital Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account